Recently, Zhengzhou citizen Wu Weichun was detained by Zhengzhou police, administrative detention in the key chain with a small fruit knife. In this regard, Mr. Wu sighed: "my little fruit knife was purchased from a regular legal supermarket. How did it suddenly become a control tool and fall into a" disgrace "? The person in charge of Zhengzhou police said on the matter that the knife mentioned by Wu Weichun was a means of control, and there was nothing wrong with whether the police's punishment decision was in line with the law. (February 21, China News)

Someone yelled on the Internet, "how can I get home with a fruit knife?" Someone exclaimed: "my God, my kitchen is an arsenal!" Although this is only a joke, but the contradiction and dissatisfaction among netizens are obvious.

To be realistic, to say "my kitchen is Arsenal" is obviously a little worried. According to the "controllable cutter identification standard", when the tip length exceeds 220 mm, the single edge tool with the tip angle greater than 60 degrees will be regarded as the controlled tool. By contrast, most kitchen knives are not listed here. According to the "standards for determining control tools", the fruit knives proposed by Wu Weichun are said to have been banned - all folding knives with self-locking devices have been identified as control tools. That is to say, from this standard, the seemingly powerful kitchen knife is far less dangerous than the folding knife.

As we all know, knives are not only necessities of daily life, but also can be used to commit crimes. The original intention of establishing control tool standard is to separate the two. But the difference is not easy. There are many cases of knife injuries, and even screwdrivers can be criminal tools. Blind enlargement of an astonishing face is bound to lead to danger for everyone. If we want to implement the control of tools, we should not only have detailed scientific standards, but also be closely related to the careful screening of the implementation.

The police's "law" sounds harsh, but it's not necessarily true. The crux of the question is whether this provision can withstand scrutiny?

The man hung the fruit chain 3 on the key chain, police said it was no problem. Wu Weichun, a Zhengzhou resident, recently held a fruit knife on a key chain and was detained by police for three days in Zhengzhou. Some media said that Wu Weichun was holding a knife in a regular supermarket. The length of the knife was 63 mm and the length was 95 mm. Zhengzhou police officer in charge of the matter said that Wu Weichun's tools are controlled knives. The punishment decision of the police is in accordance with the law and there is nothing wrong with it. (February 21, China News)

According to the police's response, Wu Weichun's detention is based on Article 32 of the law of the people's Republic of China on administrative penalties for public security: "anyone who illegally carries guns, ammunition, crossbows or daggers shall be detained for not more than five days and fined not more than 500 yuan. If the circumstances are minor, he shall be given a warning or fined not more than 200 yuan. "According to media reports, Wu Weichun's fruit knife was bought in a regular supermarket, and there was no subjective intention as to whether he violated the rules, but it did not cause serious consequences. Therefore, I personally believe that even if Wu Weichun violates the law, it also belongs to the category of "understatement". Obviously, the police have overemphasized the three-day administrative detention.

Wu Weichun is not alone in buying such a fruit knife in the supermarket. Since the police found this "illegal clue" and thought that the situation was "serious", should all the sold fruit knives be confiscated in the next step. Confiscation, warning, detention, detention? Due to the arrest of citizens with fruit knives, fruit knife supermarkets, fruit knife manufacturers and transporters should also be held responsible for their sales? Otherwise, how can the relevant departments reflect the fairness and justice of law enforcement and how to play their due role?

The official fruit knife purchased by supermarket turned out to be "control knife". How did this kind of knife enter the market? Why is there no relevant department to regulate? At the same time that supermarkets are allowed to sell openly, it is at least against the principle of human nature to carry out "severe crackdown" on citizens' purchase, even without the suspicion of "Fishing law enforcement". If the "suspect" caused by a fruit knife can not be corrected in time, it is bound to make more people feel threatened.